home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- This file is copyright of Jens Schriver (c)
- It originates from the Evil House of Cheat
- More essays can always be found at:
- --- http://www.CheatHouse.com ---
- ... and contact can always be made to:
- Webmaster@cheathouse.com
- --------------------------------------------------------------
- Essay Name : 1284.txt
- Uploader : sean beatty
- Email Address :
- Language : english
- Subject : Social Studies
- Title : welfare reform
- Grade : ab
- School System : university
- Country : usa
- Author Comments :
- Teacher Comments :
- Date : 11/19/96
- Site found at : link
- --------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
- Welfare Reform
- Welfare as seen by conservative America is a hand out to the poor. It creates
- a cycle wherein children of families on welfare continue dependency on the
- welfare their parents depended on to raise them. But, is conservative America
- setting the blame on the right shoulders? Are there enough adequate living-wage
- job opportunities to take care of America's poverty stricken masses?
- Will the cycle of poverty end with a poor, single mother working a job at
- McDonalds to support her children instead of gaining welfare benefits? I
- answer no to all these question and firmly believe that welfare reform is
- heading toward a major catastrophe.
- The current large number of people on welfare is not due to the laziness
- of the poor but to three major factors:
- 1) The top heavy distribution wealth in the U. S.of A. today.
- 2) The amount of teenage pregnancies and children born into poverty, or potential poverty situations.
- 3)Schooling systems must change to accommodate the work forces needs.
- These are definately not the only factors affecting welfare, but in my mind are
- the major factors. I will also discuss a couple of my ideas for making funds
- available for families that need it.
- Firstly, the distribution of wealth in the U.S. is astonishingly top heavy.
- Considering all assets, in 1989 the richest one percent of the population
- controls 39 percent of America's total household wealth. Whereas in financial
- wealth alone the top one percent controls 48 percent. Also, in regards to
- income, The top one percent garners 8-9 percent of total income(1).
- This gap continues to grow between the rich and middle to poor net
- wealth and income. The new American aristocracy pushes down wages for
- middle and lower class Americans, creating more of a need for government
- help programs such as welfare. However, new reforms cut benefits and
- will require a large number of unskilled workers to enter the work force.
- Current trends toward corporate downsizing, diminishing need for unskilled
- work in the manufacturing sector, and American companies going abroad to
- seek a cheaper workforce do not bode well for a newly cut off welfare
- beneficiary.
- The government proposals declare that states are responsible for designing
- programs to deal with people cut off or on welfare. States unable to find
- jobs for welfare recipients in the private sector will be forced to create
- community service jobs and the like to support the jobless. This will create
- a drain on state budgets and force state tax raises to create jobs that are
- eventually devoid of worth to the community at large because of the steadily
- increasing numbers of workers entering such jobs. Hence one would have the
- same dilemma; instead of welfare recipients "sitting around at home" they
- would be sitting around at work.
- The problem of a high number of children being born into poverty and potential
- poverty must be reduced to diminish the number of people requiring welfare.
- Education and availability of birth control is the key here. Maybe, if
- middle and high school age kids could learn about the means of contraception
- and receive them in the same place we wouldn't have such a problem.
- Distributing condoms and birth control might just be a sensible solution.
- I just have to quote conservative, Robert Rector in his paper "How Congress
- Reformed the Welfare System" which is about the triumphs of welfare reform:
-
- "At the present time, nearly one-third of all American children are born out
- of wedlock. There is a growing consensus, among liberals and conservative alike,
- that the growth in illegitimacy is a social catastrophe for the nation. The
- collapse of marriage and the rise of out-of-wedlock births encourage welfare
- dependency as well as crime and many other social problems. The welfare
- reform bill contains three provisions to combat illegitimacy. First, it will
- focus the attention of the state governments on the illegitimacy problem by
- requiring each state to set numerical goals for reducing illegitimacy over the
- next ten years. Second, it will provide bonus funding to states which reduce
- illegitimacy without increasing abortion rates. Third, it will create a new
- program to provide abstinence education, funded at $50 million per year.(2)"
-
- I see that the U.S. is going on one of its oh so popular "wars on (state
- bad thing here)." Yes, it's installment 856 of the "wars on" saga this
- episode: illegitimacy. First of all, illegitimacy is not the big problem
- here, children born into poverty is the problem so let not blame everyone
- not choosing to have a child in "gods sacred union." Requiring states to
- magically wave their wand and instill the morals of the 1950's on their
- citizens is not a healthy practice. Legislation will not limit the amount
- of children being born out of wed-lock. Secondly, the new welfare reformers
- idea of limiting teenage births is abstinence education, and they allotted
- $50 million to make kids think fucking isn't cool. American culture has
- already defined teenage sex/pregnancies as an occurrence that is no longer
- taboo. $50 million will not put a dent in our cultures view of premarital
- sex when the movie industry routinely spends more than that on one movie
- that portrays premarital sex as a regular occurrence (as it is in America,
- and will be for a long time to come). Give congress a shot of reality and
- make them watch the movie "Kids" is what I say.
- The nature of school needs to change. U.S. schools prepare students for a
- generalized goal of priming students for a generalized college. Schools
- must specialize to meet the needs of the work force as well as the needs
- of students. I am a very big supporter of the magnet school system with
- a few alterations. I think that high school as far as general education
- should be finished in two years. After that student should be allowed to
- go on and study what they want to. Germany's use of industry sponsored
- apprenticeships is a brilliant idea. Let industry train the workers they
- need. If academic pursuits are what a student wishes for let them continue
- within the magnet school they require. Talented artists and craftsmen
- should be allowed to pursue apprenticeships or go to an arts magnet.
- Give students with learning disabilities a school can meet their needs.
- This will help meet industry's expectations for the workforce and also
- give students an out to the stagnant atmosphere of normal high schools.
- Catering to students tastes and dreams may help students maintain faith
- in their schooling, bringing up the success rates of U.S. schools. Also
- the magnet school system allows students from different financial and
- cultural backgrounds mix and may help some kids that maybe brought up
- on welfare see that there are other opportunities.
- Well, I guess I just stated my idea for reforming schools to bring down
- the amount of dependence welfare (as well as the quality of education).
- And I think it slipped out how I would try to bring down the number of
- children born into poverty. But how are we going to remedy the problems
- with wealth distribution? Well, we could use the problem with wealth
- distribution to our advantage and institute a wealth tax. A wealth tax
- has been instituted in many European countries. Here is what the Swiss
- model for a wealth tax applied to America would look like:
- Net worth, excluding pension wealth and household effects (and
- automobiles worth up to $10,000) would be taxed annually.
- The first $100,000 would be exempt, eliminating two-thirds of all
- households from having to pay wealth tax.Rates would range from
- one-twentieth of one percent for those in the $100,000-$199,000 range
- to 3/10's of one percent for those over the one million mark. Only three
- percent of families would see their tax bill raise over 10%.
- Wealth tax to be filed along with income tax.(1)
- In addition to wealth tax, I would end one type of corporate welfare:
- the accelerated depreciation tax break. This tax break is based on
- companies not being able to modernize as fast technology is advancing.
- It's a ludicrous break because the rate technology advances just keeps
- going up. Therefore the break keeps going up. That tax break will cost
- tax payers 27.2 billion dollars this year alone(3). In addition to the
- $40 billion accumulated from the wealth tax(1). That's just short of
- 70 billion dollars more to invest in a total overhauling of the
- educational system including the changes I outlined earlier.
- Additionally refurbishing sexual education to reflect todays culture.
- In concluding I'd like to say the new welfare reform leaves a bad
- taste in my mouth and it makes me worry about the future of the U.S.
- Changes made be old men who long for the fifties and don't want to
- address real issues that affect us today scare me. My views on welfare
- and for that matter the entire way politics has runs lately has lead me
- to the practice of not voting any more. Until a candidate I can actually
- indorse has a chance in hell to win I won't. Changes I believe in for
- welfare will not even be considered until it's too late if at all. Who
- knows maybe it'll turn out okay.
-
-
- Works Cited
-
-
-
- 1) Wolff, Edward N. "Time for a Wealth Tax?" On-line. Internet. Accessed 10 November 1996. availible: http://epn.org/tcf/xxwolf01.html.
-
- 2) Rector, Robert. "How Congress Reformed the Welfare System" On-line. Internet
- Accessed 10 Nov. 1996. Available: http://www.heritage.org/heritage/congress/chap5.html
-
- 3) Shields, Janice. "Balanced Budget Hypocracy" On-line Internet. Accessed 10 Nov. 1996 Available: http://www.essential.org/listproc/corporate-welfare/0032.html
-
- --------------------------------------------------------------
-